Let us welcome the publication of the index of Gini On December 17, this index of income disparities, France (with 0.293 approaching the 0 of equality) is rather less unequal than the average for Europeans:


A question asked daily: how many French people are below the proposed quota of 9t/year in the first year.

Scientists are working on it, Lucas Chancel has just updated and developed the study cited further on climate inequalities in the world:

Etude Lucas Chancel avec data

We will retain two graphs for France and Europe:

The average values for France and Europe are therefore quite similar*, especially for the 50% of people with the lowest incomes. The average announced of 8.7 is close to the value of 9 by the Ministry. The 610 million t are divided into 5t for the 50% of French people with low incomes, 9.3 for the 40% of French people in deciles 6-7-8-9 and 25t/year/person for the 10th decile, the 10% of French people with the highest incomes (whose footprint is also decreasing faster than the others, decreasing by more than 5t/p in 30 years).


(*) these are the average values which are similar for Europe, but large disparities remain between Germans or Luxembourgers and Romanians or Slovaks, making it impossible to pool the progressive ceiling and requiring European coordination as proposed by www.cequic.eu



To answer the question, we assume that 65% of the French population would be below 9t/year/person upon reading this brilliant study. 61% would be below the second year quota and 57% would be below the 3rd year quota...


Etude Lucas Chancel avec data

Thoughts on climate change: out of 1000 young French people, how many believe that:

· People have not taken care of the planet: 77%

· The future is scary: 74%

· Humanity is doomed: 48%

· Fewer opportunities than parents: 61%

· Most things you love will be destroyed: 45%

· Family life security will be threatened: 50%

· I hesitate to have children: 37%

It can be compared to the nine other countries studied by Caroline Hickman's team in seven universities.

Caroline Hickman study published in Lancet Planetary Health on September 7, 2021

IPCC report of August 9, 2021

An exceptional figure (page 1.212 under number 1.29) shows us the greenhouse gases in the 5 most commonly used scenarios (CO2 in blue, methane in light gray and nitrous oxide in dark gray). The SSP5-8.5 scenario called "do nothing" leads to a CO2 peak in 2200 at 2100 ppm (5 times more than today, a rate for which NASA claims that we lose 40% of our capacities).
The SSP1-1.9 scenario (that of the carbon account) shows a return to the concentration of 2000 from 2150, having passed through more than 500ppm in around 2040.

The supply chain must take carbon content into account according to the rating agency ECOVADIS, which is kicking up a snag in the anthill of European industrial greenwashing arrangements:

Read the Summary by Novethic (July 12, 2021)

A two-minute film to be broadcast, proposed by Nicolas Chateauneuf for the France 2 news on January 15, 2021:

The best resources are online thanks to the speakers of www.assisesduclimat.fr

Risk of earth-oven


Will Steffen's multidisciplinary research et al is to be downloaded here :

It has been observed that for 100,000 years, the average temperature of the globe and the sea level have fluctuated according to CO2 levels of 200 to 300ppm. Since the Anthropocene less than two centuries ago, CO2 has increased sharply to reach 410ppm* currently. Scientists predict that we can still stabilize the movement if we limit warming to 2°C (at least 1.5°C). If we do not reduce our greenhouse gases by 40% before 2030, then the planet is heading towards a chaotic, absolutely unstable functioning, as shown at the top right of the curve.
* ppm = parts per million or grams per tonne.

Question of "profitability": France Stratégie, through its "Value of Action for the Climate" commission, published a study in February 2019 estimating the tutelary value of a tonne of carbon at €90 in 2020, €250 in 2030 and €775 in 2050, according to the report included in this illustrated page with an interview with Alain Quinet: 'https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/publications/de-laction-climat' (clarification: this is expressed in euros/tonne of CO2 eq.).

In the https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compte_carbone#Effects_pour_l’emploi It is estimated that 50,000 jobs will be created, which could cost France €2 billion per year; let's divide these €2 billion by the value of the CO2 avoided:
The planned 6% reduction of the total of 700 million tonnes amounts to 42 million tonnes.

Each tonne avoided would therefore cost €48, or €42 in savings per tonne compared to the 2020 assessment of €90 by France Stratégie.

The same Wikipedia study estimates that a tonne of carbon could quickly reach €1,000, which is barely one euro per kg of CO2 equivalent.

France Strategy Report (Alain Quinet, 2019)

Less cognitive abilities

The effects of carbon dioxide concentration on the brain have long been studied for confined environments, Joseph Allen (study by clicking opposite) demonstrates that an increase from 600 to 1000 ppm generates a loss of 21% of our cognitive abilities (memorization, reaction speed, recognition abilities, etc.). Studies listed by the IPCC have calculated that we could reach 550 ppm CO2 in 2050 and 1000 in 2100 in the Earth's atmosphere. We could suffer an average loss of 15% of our cognitive abilities according to Rob Hopkins who cites them on page 79 in "What if..." 2020, Actes sud.

How much do we emit?

The High Council for Climate has produced a synthesis brilliant in June 2019 showing that total French emissions are 11t/person per year, including 40% of imported gray energy. In round numbers, France emits 480 million tons of CO2 eq. and causes 270 t more on imported products and services, emitting outside France. The 2021 update mentions 663 million t divided into 436 emitted locally, 357 imported and 130 exported.

Please note that in June 2022, the HCC is publishing an excellent annual report where it reports that the 2020 French footprint is:
France's total carbon footprint is estimated
to 552 Mt eqCO2 in 2020, according to provisional estimates
the most recent from the SDES. Reported to the population,
the carbon footprint is 8.2 Mt eqCO2 per
inhabitant in 2020... Hard to follow, right? Let's wait for the next correction, the 6% increase brings it to 585, not far from the 610 announced by the Ministry for 2019.
High Council Climate General Public File 2022 High Council Climate General Public File 2021 High Climate Council Report April 2020

October 2020, the HCC publishes its file on imported carbon which confirms our approach of counting all carbon in the purchases and services of all consumers: it recommends four levers, incentivizing companies (and here we incentivize companies through their customers), incentivizing consumers, harmonizing it across Europe and stopping imported deforestation.

HCC Report October 2020

The European comparison table is based on 2012 data, it is taken from the report HCC from October 2020

Rapport du Giec

In his report of November 24, 2020, the High Council for Climate reports that (contrary to our old visual below) "buildings are responsible for 36% of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union and 28% in France, taking into account indirect emissions linked to the production of electricity and heat (…) Buildings thus consume nearly 40% of final energy in Europe."
See the full report attached, still weak compared to what carbon counting would bring...

HCC Building Report

It is the Hawaiian observatory of Mauna Loa which most precisely follows the evolutions of carbon dioxide in the global atmosphere, the record was reached in April 2020 with 416 ppm according to thestudy Météo-Contact. A Canadian satellite tracks methane emissions in real time by providing striking images of the globe according to Futura-Sciences.

The 1.5°C precipice before our eyes
According to Chancel and Piketty, the richest 50% in France emit 20t/year compared to 4t for the least rich (2013 values to be increased by 10%).
The table shows transport emissions (2010 values) on differences between suburbs, cities and countryside, with a ratio of 1 to 3 between poorest and richest (Extract from Alternatives économiques). It is interesting to note that rural areas emit slightly less than large suburbs. Source SOeS.
According to Chancel and Piketty, the richest 50% in France emit 20t/year compared to 4t for the least rich (2013 values to be increased by 10%).

What about at the global level? Let us quote the study by Corinne Le Quéré et al from the Global Carbon Project
here in pdf (the most complete file we know of):
The same file shows the forecast developments according to different scenarios compiled by the IPCC:

The distribution of consumption has been re-evaluated by the High Council for Climate in a file presented at www.assiseduclimat.fr (file available below), it results in two explicit graphs on the responsibility of imports in our overall French footprint:

European data

Eurostat periodically publishes the latest statistical information from the European Union, which can be consulted at https://www.touteleurope.eu/actualite/climat-la-reduction-des-emissions-de-co2-en-europe.html
European climate

Carbon sinks

Let us also mention the study published by Nature, coordinated by Philippe CIAIS, to be downloaded here, to fully understand the importance of carbon sinks and the seriousness of global developments.

Carbon sinks

The currency

Apart from climate issues, we must mention monetary economists and in particular Ludovic Desmedt who analyses the trends and risks in the debate between cash and smart cards, in the excellent France Culture programme:
The end of cash?
Thesis by Mathilde Szuba

As developed in the REMARK 44, the economist Mathilde Szuba studied, for her thesis, the experiments conducted in different countries, her interview in Socialter is documented and stimulating to show the feasibility...
Article Socialter
If we do not act against climate change, nearly 20% of the Earth could become difficult to live in by 2070, with temperatures approaching those currently observed in the Sahara. Nearly 3.5 billion people could end up in these areas, mainly located in developing countries such as India, Nigeria and also Guyana. This is the conclusion from the study to click opposite, reported by Novethic.

A great team around our friend Vianney has put together a set of proposals to broaden the audience of the carbon accounting principle. We suggest you study the PowerPoint presentation that was presented on November 10 (and renewed on March 11) at the national Shifters meeting, below: (their 184-page report has been under review in the national shifters office since June, with validation due in November 2021).

A complementary Powerpoint to expand
Share by: